HKPEOC MUST PUBLICLY REPLY THE FOLLOWING: (SEE MESSAGE BELOW)

[Dl]

HKPEOC MUST REPLY PUBLICLY THE FOLLOWING: (SEE MESSAGE BELOW)

[Dl]

PLEASE ANSWER THE THREE QUESTIONS BELOW.

[Dl]

PLEASE ANSWER.

[Team3@HKPEOC]

We cannot see the “three questions below.” Could you please put the questions here again?

[Dl]

<p style=”text-align: left;”>Q1. Is draft 2.0 written following the format, i.e. form and content, of a statue?</p>
Q2. Why is the requirement of drafting the constitution, the most important task that Elmer and Victor referred to, not listed in draft 2.0 when the other requirements are listed?

Q3. Does the way that draft 2.0 is written lead to the inescapable conclusion that if there are only 35 candidates, then all of them will be elected?

[Team2@HKPEOC]

Hi DI,

We are actively considering your comment at the moment. And sorry for the late reply to you.  As you know we missed your comments in the forum as they were at the bottom of the forum. We have forward your opinion to the EOC. It will need some time to give responses to your opinion. We take every comment seriously. I hope you understand and keep support HKPEOC.

[Author]

Posts