感謝薇羽看世間報導
Author: admin
感謝王岸然頻道報導!
感謝王岸然頻道報導!
感謝NTD報導!
感謝NTD報導!
感謝曉風傳媒走天下報導!
感謝曉風傳媒走天下報導!
Declaration of HKPEOC in Response to Defamatory Allegations
Declaration of HKPEOC in Response to Defamatory Allegations
We, the Hong Kong Parliament Electoral Organizing Committee (HKPEOC), hereby address an issue concerning some recent malicious allegations against the HKPEOC which plausibly give rise to public’s doubts casted upon HKPEOC’s mission.
It has come to our attention that certain individuals have labeled our election plan as a “scam” in the absence of any concrete evidence. In refuting those unsubstantiated allegations, we are taking a firm stance that any, libel, slander, defamatory or unfounded allegations against HKPEOC or our individual member(s) will not be tolerated. We expressly reserve the legal rights to take action against the defamers.
HKPEOC is a non-profit and non-partisan organization established by Hongkongers living overseas for the purpose of facilitating the establishment of ‘Hong Kong Parliament (HKP)’ through universal suffrage. Our mission stems from the principles of representation, unity, and empowerment.
We vow to commit ourselves in serving HongKongers with a goal to recover democracy and self-determination for the community through transparent means.
We are aware of some individuals’ concern since HKP is emerging with a novel concept, especially in the realm of politics. We hereby unequivocally state that those false allegations of our election plan being a “scam” are baseless and unmeritorious. With utmost sincerity, we openly invite those who are doubtful about HKP to constructively engage with us in good faith. Our door is open for dialogue and we are happy to clarify any questions surrounding HKP’s functions.
We understand the importance of trust in any democratic endeavor. As such, we are dedicated to sustain the highest standard of integrity, accountability, and credibility throughout our journey. We hold ourselves accountable to all HongKongers, whether living in or outside Hong Kong.
We stand unwavering in our pursuit of democratic values and the well-being of our fellow Hongkongers. We call upon all HongKongers to come forward with a spirit of understanding and mutual respect. Together, we pave the way for a brighter future for Hong Kong.
The HKPEOC
22th Aug, 2023
感謝鄭文傑先生和香港冇格仔報導香港議會
感謝鄭文傑先生和香港冇格仔報導香港議會
PBS aired a 7-minute interview with Yuan Gongyi on July 28th
Thanks for PBS interview.
//Beijing cracked down on pro-democracy activists. China is now trying to extend the reach of its repression by targeting critics living in exile. John Yang discussed more with Elmer Yuen.//
Interview on Elmer Yuen By 白影
Elmer Yuen is wanted by National security department of Hong Kong Government. He will talk about the detail of Hong Kong Parliament and response on criticism from the public.
Hong Kong Parliament Electoral Organizing Committee Holds Press Conference
整合協會等於搭大台?探討可行性與出路
整合協會等於搭大台?探討可行性與出路
撰文:彰壹棯
日期:2023年1月6日
喺2019年反送中運動嘅時候,其中一個行動綱領為「無大台」,而起源相信係梁天琦所帶起。但事實上梁天琦當年強調嘅係摒棄「教條主義」,恰巧當年信任大台、跟從大台行動綱領為大部分參與者所信之事,所以梁先提到摒棄教條主義先要「無大台」。
16、19年,大部分帶領者都係左膠,同時亦唔能夠真實反映示威者嘅訴求同聲音,因此筆者同意香港內嘅抗爭運動並唔一定需要一個大台。比起大台,我更相信群眾嘅個人意志所組成嘅集體意志。但當香港人散落係唔同國家嘅時候,呢個「無大台」又可唔可行?係咪其中一個需要摒棄嘅「教條主義」呢?
要知道,統一可以有更好嘅整合資源,令到成件事做起上嚟更有行動綱領,資源更加集中。喺海外港人人手、財政均資源不足下,成立聯合議政平台並整合各協會不失為可行之出路,唯成立此平台之前提為受眾需有獨立思考能力,判別大台之決策,在大台作出不合理判斷時不麻木跟從,有必要時運用自身主權更替大台,例如以罷工/課一例:
如果「大台」叫罷,但我唔明白或唔贊同罷工/課的話,可以自由決定跟唔跟隨行動。同時唔會俾人屌話「唔夠團結」或「分化」,群眾要學識唔用「大台」情緒勒索他人。
咁統一各個協會資源、將已有資源整合、統一國際遊說路線,將會非常理想。統一之後,大家亦都唔需要將資源放喺同一件事身上。咁做將可節省非常多嘅時間成本、人力、物力,將資源擺喺其他需關注項目之上。
喺咁理想嘅狀態下,大台一說亦都唔會成立,只不過係一個帶領整體行動方向,負責資源整合嘅平台。
問題在於半多群眾缺乏獨立思考嘅,會跟從KOL或某政治明星所牽頭之行動。先唔講佢地有無民意授權,能否成為帶領者。只講未思考其合理性及作用,甚或者不認同也因呼籲而麻木跟隨,並冇獨立能力思考自己應唔應該跟從所謂「大台」嘅行動,已經夠令平台坍塌。
筆者認為要擔心嘅係,現有主要由民眾為首去推翻有機會變質嘅大台由一定難度,而令成立大台就必須承受有變質風險。民眾亦都好可能會鬧一班唔跟從大台指引嘅「小眾」,亦曾發生過好多次,就以「沒有大台」為例,筆者嘗試作有關大台之討論時已經成為箭靶。
民眾唔保持開放心態,依舊迷信號召者,打住反大台嘅旗號擁護「教條主義」,整合過後繼續行落去存在一定風險。
理想一定係有一個聯合議政平台,遺憾現階段旗與旗之間嘅關係,民眾繼續停留係19年「無大台,兄弟爬山」嘅話,無大台又又又成為左第二個教條主義……整合遙遙無期。
咁你有咩高見?
筆者認為現階段最有能力整合各黃營人士,係以前喺香港有民意授權嘅代表,例如由流散在外嘅前立法會議員 或 一眾區議會前議員成立籌委會之議政平台。後續,(或)再舉行選舉,會較為理想及有公信力。