Team3@HKPEOC

討論回覆已建立

正在檢視 10 篇文章 - 31 至 40 (共計 40 篇)
  • 作者
    文章
  • 回覆至: TO HKPEOC: IF YOU DON’T ACT FAIRLY. #7346
    Team3@HKPEOC
    版主

      We always aim for openness to ensure fairness to all HKers. Our draft 2 election regulation and all relevant documents are posted on HKP website, inviting queries and criticisms.

      回覆至: TO HKPEOC: IF YOU CAN’T THINK AND FEEL FAIRLY. #7345
      Team3@HKPEOC
      版主

        We are sorry that we missed your valuable suggestions. As said, we are gathering your comments, making sure that we do not miss any and reply you soon.

        回覆至: TO HKPEOC: DON’T PRETEND TO FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY, #7344
        Team3@HKPEOC
        版主

          HKP has been working very hard to promote democracy that was not allowed in HK. We understand that there are rooms for improvement and we will continue our goal until we will achieve it one day.

          回覆至: TO HKPEOC: DON’T PRETEND TO BE ON THE SIDE OF DEMOCRACY, #7343
          Team3@HKPEOC
          版主

            HKP has been promoting one-person-one-vote. We are sorry if we did not communicate well with the public and all supporters.

            回覆至: TO HKPEOC: WILL ROT IN HELL. #7342
            Team3@HKPEOC
            版主

              Hope you will continue to support HKP.

              回覆至: Ed Chin’s “forum” today #7341
              Team3@HKPEOC
              版主

                Thank you for passing the information to us. HKP hope the panelists can bridge the misunderstanding between HKP and the kol and former council members in HKP. Hope we are united in supporting HKers.

                回覆至: TO HKPEOC: THOSE INFILTRATORS AMONG YOU, #7340
                Team3@HKPEOC
                版主

                  Please clarify what you mean.

                  回覆至: 有關香港議會最重要的功能討論 #6120
                  Team3@HKPEOC
                  版主

                    多謝老湯支持者的提議,將來在候選人論壇下一可向候選人提出這建議。

                    回覆至: 為甚麼要做民意調查? #5554
                    Team3@HKPEOC
                    版主

                      多謝吳宗錡和James的討論,想民調的用途和做法是多樣的,<wbr />有些民調亦沒有事先討論,只要方案和選項己清晰便可,<wbr />比如投票年齡由十六歲開始是國際做法,只要網上搜查便會見到,<wbr />況且事先討論有時會被指責為企途引導民意,<wbr />此外大家亦應注意這樣的民調,是採取convenience sampling (方便抽樣)的,並沒有像鍾庭耀做的random sampling (隨機抽樣)的嚴謹和可靠,亦由於樣本基數底,<wbr />議會沒有完全根據民調結果做決定,這是可理解的,<wbr />但民調仍給予寶貴的参考價值。

                      回覆至: 還我公投 #5552
                      Team3@HKPEOC
                      版主

                        多謝光復香港廣場提出公投的意見,<wbr />籌委員會建立一議會平台讓議員共同決定,<wbr />不過議會沒有實質政府的權力,不能執行公投方案,<wbr />對公投的効能有一定影嚮。

                      正在檢視 10 篇文章 - 31 至 40 (共計 40 篇)
                      香港中文