3RD REPLY TO TEAM 2 MODERATOR RE HKPEOC RESPONSE

[Dl]

Dear Moderator,

If my remarks have been overly critical in my last two replies, then let me say again that the mission statement is much improved and reflects the standards of HKPEOC. Obviously, I look forward to the other  improvements.

Let us not forget that President Chang Kai-shek lost to Mao due, in no small part, to CCP spies. One such spies was none other than Chang’s personal secretary. This reminds me of Elmer’s recent failures in securing a VPN company.

To whom did Elmer disclose this information of which VPN company to approach? As could be gleaned from Elmer’s second last program from today, one of whom is Dr. Gong, the trusted consultant. As stated, it is beneficial for Dr. Gong to act as consultant even if she is a CCP operative, as long as sensitive information is kept from her.

If we do not learn from past mistakes, we tend to repeat them. Although President Chang and Elmer share no common life experiences, l doubt if Chang was any less intelligent.

Could we afford to be less vigilant?

With kind regards,

 

 

 

 

 

[Team1@HKPEOC]

<p style="”text-align:" left;”>Dear Dl,</p>
Your  commendation for the  enhancements made to the English version of our HKP website are sincerely appreciated. We are thrilled that the improvements have not gone unnoticed. We acknowledge your concerns surrounding the credibility of Dr.Gong.Rest assured, your apprehensions will be promptly conveyed to Elmer,to keep him vigilant and informed.

Yours faithfully,

[作者]

文章